Reflections on Hope Leslie

The Noble Savage: A Contradiction and Backhanded Compliment

“You’re not like the others”-What the title of “noble savage” really means. Google Images.

What if I told you were smart for a girl, you were hot for an Asian guy, you were well-spoken for a black girl? Are these compliments? They are claused, there is a reluctance there. You feel it; a begrudging praise that patronizes and reveals the prejudices of the speaker. These are not compliments and neither is the idea of a “Noble Savage.”

This idea of a Noble Savage is an immediate contradiction. To be noble is to be virtuous, honorable, a blue-blood, royal even. To be a savage is to be none of these things; savages are wild, brutish, unreasonable, cold-blooded, beasts. In reading Catharine Sedgwick’s Hope Leslie, I noticed some similarities to another text I had read, Oroonoko by Aphra Behn. In this novel, an actual African prince is enslaved, perfectly embodying the image of the Noble Savage. He is described in European terms; his humanity is proven, justified, in terms that European/white colonists would understand and sympathize with. He speaks the language of his masters  and they are awed by him. His beauty is assessed through European standards and thus, there is never a moment when he is considered as equal. He is instead a special case. He is magical, ethereal, unreal. As long the Europeans believed themselves to be the only and ultimate standard in everything, then everything not white is then, not equal. Oroonoko, like Magawisca, gains the friendship of the white colonists and though they admire him, they do not respect or trust him. He, like Magawisca,  is given certain freedoms but all the while, he is being watched because–for all their ooh and ahhing–the white colonists still fear him. He is marveled at and people are shocked that a race they have dehumanized could possibly contain actual humans equal or superior to themselves but this marvelling is not to be confused for respect. Admiration is not respect. You can admire and still hold some hate and prejudice for the admired.

In Hope Leslie, we see that Magawisca is respected because of an air she has about her. She is smiled at because of the simple and beautiful way she speaks. There is something so wrong in this admiration. It is like if you were to smile at a dog for sitting when told or a child for learning a new word. You are surprised because they are not equal to you yet they are trying to be so. It is patronizing how Magawisca is considered beautiful according to European standards. She speaks English fluently and altogether she has, if not assimilated, earned the respect and acceptance of the Puritans. This is not because the Puritans respect just anyone but because they respect anyone like them.

To bring this concept up to date, let us consider the movie Zootopia (it’s on Netflix!). In the animated movie, animals are like humans and live in a civilization modeled after any of our diverse major cities. This movie presents the same idea in Hope Leslie of there being an exception to every stereotype. This is seen in the relationship between the characters of Judy Hopps and Nick Wilde. Hopps has been, like Hope Leslie, raised among a people with prejudices against predators–foxes in particular. Hopps similarly lives with a superficial sense that she is not so biased against others or the great big Other–foxes, Native Americans, etc. We view both Hopps and Hope Leslie as progressive and tolerant characters that are remarkably unaffected by the biased rhetoric of their families. Yet they no longer seem so rebellious when their liberal sensibilities are tested.

When Hope Leslie sees her estranged sister in the arms of Oneco, a Native American, her immediate reaction is disgust. She is physically repulsed by this intimacy between her sister and a Native American. She who seemed so liberal has in fact internalized the racism her family has constantly hinted at. When Judy Hopps enters Zootopia, her hand is often ready to grab her bottle of fox mace or take for instance the moment she tells Nick Wilde that he is not like them, the “them” being all the other foxes and predators who she definitely believes are dangerous.

The idea of a Noble Savage is not progressive but ignorant. Google Images.

This idea of the Noble Savage is not a compliment, it is an expression that patronizes as it praises. You’re alright, it says, for a Native American. You are beautiful, for a _____, you are smart, for a _____, you are funny, for a ____. These are not compliments, they are expressions of shock that you are not like the stereotype. They reveal that the speaker believes in the stereotype and are no different from the more explicitly racist majority.
This reminds me also of the Model Minority Myth, where Asian-Americans (South, East, etc.) are complimented for being so exemplary. They are complimented for being like white Americans, for abiding by the terms set by white America. This stereotype is used to put down African-Americans for their not being able to–allowed to–succeed like white people do. This myth depersonalizes a whole population and defines them through white terms. It is bad all around. 

So I am asked, is Magawisca a good example of the Noble Savage. I answer, Magawisca is Magawisca. The Noble Savage is a perspective, a white perspective, where all of the actions of a minority–a hated minority–are compared to the assumed superior group–the Puritans; Magawisca does not succeed entirely. According to the Puritan Noble Savage rubric, which I made just now, Magawisca succeeds in learning the language of the Puritans, in behaving modestly–a Puritan gendered virtue–, in being “beautiful even to an European eye”(Sedgwick, 25) and this is truly, in their “eye”, high praise. She is dressed in a waistcoat, petticoat and “leggins” which resemble the European style of dress more than anything. She passes with high scores so far. She has befriended and saved the life of Everell Fletcher, that must count for something. It is when we reach religious views that Magawisca fails, but fails peculiarly. She is adamant in her refusal of any of the Christian religions and this irks her Puritan friends but does not drive them away. During a stakeout with Everell, she is seen coming and going from the woods and is distrusted by all but Everell. She is, when imprisoned towards the end of the novel, called a heathen because she believes in her own, non-Christian religion yet is still loved by Everell and Hope Leslie. At this point, she is considered an enemy by most and is no longer regarded so highly by her jailers. Even her “high-born” air is seen as a negative by one member of the court who notes, “See, with what an air [Magawisca] comes among her betters, as if she were a queen of us all”(Sedgwick, 297). Her actions are no longer viewed in a positive light. Fundamentally, she has not changed at all. What has changed is the Puritan’s perception of her. She no longer–perhaps never– fit the Noble Savage archetype because, though she is marveled at and respected by a few Puritans, she is not trusted entirely, she is not accepted entirely, she is not, in the Puritans eyes, like them.

The idea of the Noble Savage depends entirely on the opinions of the dominant people. Like respectability politics where a people–who have been wronged–must behave calmly and play by the rules in order to prove that they are worth the consideration of their oppressors, the Noble Savage archetype reveals the white colonist belief that people must earn respect, must justify their right to be treated fairly and as equals. Do you not see this today? I ask you, are we all no better than the musty Puritans?


6 thoughts on “The Noble Savage: A Contradiction and Backhanded Compliment

  1. Amazing blog post! Extremely interesting from the first questions you ask about the backhandedness of calling someone “smart for a girl”, etc. It only got better with all the other examples you used to prove your point about the Noble Savage. I know I knew the definition but the clarity in which you described the term was so perfect even a child could grasp it. It’s more impressive because you did it under 1000 words. Including your own experience reading another book (Oroonoko) related to the topic was especially smart of you to emphasize your knowledge of the subject.
    I personally love Zootopia and how you tied the prejudice and bias in their society to ours in the time period of Hope Leslie sends a very strong, potent message. I can’t express how much I appreciated your post. It’s really well done, kudos!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Really well written post! I think your uses of “Zootopia” and “Oroonoko” were great as a supplements to your already-clear definition of “noble savage”. I appreciate that you didn’t discuss the term only in regards to “Hope Leslie”, but you showed that the form of thinking that is behind the concept of the noble savage is still very relevant. Everything seemed to flow from one topic to the next and your tone is very consistent. I especially liked this sentence: “I answer, Magawisca is Magawisca”; it was a very powerful statement to make after having spoken at length about how harmful it is to view groups of people as “Others”. I understood it as acknowledging the dangerous existence of prejudices while refusing to partake in them.

    Overall, incredible! Loved it from start to finish!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Your opening lines were very well chosen! I loved that you drew attention to backhanded compliments that people hear every day, that they might not even realize they are getting let alone realize that they are a problem, before you jumped into how those kinds of comments factor into Hope Leslie and what that means. Cultural relativity (judging someone’s culture by their standards and not your own— in this case, judging Native Americans by Native American standards instead of European ones) is really lacking in the novel, and you really brought that fact to the forefront. I also like that you asked whether we see these things today, because we definitely do.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. I am literally screaming inside by how perfect this blog post was. I’m sorry but all your references were on point. Loved the zootopia photo(which by the way was a very deep and complex movie for a childrens movie like it brought up some serious questions). Anyway, I completely agree with you. The comment is very backhanded. It’s as if to say, wow you’re better than the rest of your kind. Almost as if you are amazed that they could achieve what they did despite being who they are which in reality has no bearing on you and your individual capabilities. The post was overall very well-organized and I could hear your personal voice and opinion coming through very clearly which made it entertaining as well as very powerful. Great job!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Bravo! This is stunning. I love how you answered the noble savage question by stepping out of the frame and using that to guide your answer. I, too, feel like the whole construction of the “noble savage” is a way for the white settlers to try to convince themselves that they were more progressive than they actually were, mainly by making comparisons between the Native Americans and themselves. By looking for what makes people similar, solidarity can be found between two groups of people, but the way this is done throughout history is so wrong and dehumanizing that it kind of contradicts itself. As you noted, just adding the word “noble” before “savage” doesn’t take away from the fact that the speaker just othered the person or people they are talking about. It’s like taking two steps forward and one step back.

  6. Obviously, wonderful post. I love that you drew parallels to modern society; it not only more fully fleshes out the idea of the noble savage, but it also magnifies the fact that the idea is still in practice today, only on unspoken terms.

    I also appriciated that you answered “Magawisca is Magawisca”. Although you note that she fits the stereotype to some degree, it is very important to note that whatever Magawisca does or does not do should not be measured against any standard created by an oppressive force.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s